For agencies, consultancies and IT/software services firms

You lose more bids than you win. And you rarely find out why.

RFPs and proposals get decided in a room you’re not in, and procurement rarely gives real feedback. We interview the prospects who picked someone else — and the ones who picked you — and tell you what actually drove the decision.

For firms that win work through proposals and RFPs — agencies, consultancies, IT services, software development shops.
A prospect who picked a competitor has no obligation to explain why. A neutral third party gets the honest version.
  • Interviews with prospects who chose someone else
  • Patterns across your last dozen bids, not just one debrief
  • Proposal and pitch adjustments grounded in what they said

Your BD notes show the outcome. Not the reasoning.

“They went cheaper” is the easiest note to write after a loss. It’s also usually incomplete.

BD notes

“Lost the RFP — they went with someone cheaper.”

What the prospect told us

Your rate wasn’t the issue. The winning firm sent a named senior partner to the pitch; yours sent an account exec they’d never met. That read as a staffing risk, not a price decision.

Proposal outcome

“No feedback given — standard procurement policy.”

What the prospect told us

Procurement never asked them to stay quiet. Nobody from your side called to ask — the silence was assumed, not required.

Won the bid

“Strong proposal, good chemistry.”

What the prospect told us

The proposal was similar to the runner-up’s. They picked you because you were the only firm that asked about their internal politics before pitching a solution.

How we work

Start with your last dozen bids.

You see the pattern across recent wins and losses before committing to anything ongoing.

01
Pilot · ~3–4 weeks

Interviews on 10–15 recent proposals

We interview the prospects from your most recent won and lost bids — reaching out as an independent research firm, not as you — and deliver a findings report on what actually drove each decision.

02
Ongoing program · monthly, billed quarterly

Interviews continue as bids close

Interviews continue as new proposals win or lose, with monthly updates and a quarterly report. Pitch and proposal adjustments get made from a growing pattern, not a one-off debrief.

Pricing

Estimate: the pilot runs $3,000–5,000 for 10–15 interviews and a findings report. The ongoing program is scoped on the pilot call.

Who we work with.

Founder / Managing Partner

Closest to the pitch, no time to dig

You’re usually in the room for the pitch but not for the internal conversation that decides it.

Head of Business Development

Writes the next proposal off the last one’s guesswork

Without real feedback, every RFP response is a repeat of whatever worked or failed last time — for reasons nobody confirmed.

Probably not the right fit if — you respond to fewer than a handful of competitive proposals a quarter, you already get direct debrief calls with prospects who decline, or your losses are consistently pure price-shopping with no room to change the pitch.

Start the pilot.

Interviews with 10–15 recent proposal decisions, delivered as a findings report. $3,000–5,000. No recurring commitment.

You approve every outreach first

We never contact a prospect without your sign-off, and we identify ourselves as an independent research firm.

Self-contained

If the findings don’t surface anything useful, you walk away with the report and owe nothing else.

We reply within a day.